[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: emacs20 obsolete? (Re: How to find all reverse depends of a package?)

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:54:17AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >Perhaps the maintainer hasn't requested its removal?  I don't see a bug
> >report open against ftp.debian.org.
> I seem to remember him requesting it.  Further, you'll see on the RC bugs
> list that it's listed as REMOVE (and has been for a while).  Perhaps the bug 
> report was already closed (because the archive maintenance scripts are 
> already trying to remove it)?

The RC bug list REMOVE tags mean "remove from testing (not unstable)".

If a bug's filed against ftp.d.o, there's no "trying" -- it'll be removed,
and any packages that depend on it will be left broken.


Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

Australian DMCA (the Digital Agenda Amendments) Under Review!
	-- http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/blog/copyright/digitalagenda

Attachment: pgpb12vE1n8JF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: