In order to get realtime capabilities, jackd can be run with a suid wrapper (jackstart), instead of being run as root, if the following patch is applied to the kernel: --- capability.h.old 2003-11-11 19:57:49.000000000 -0700 +++ capability.h 2003-11-11 19:56:55.000000000 -0700 @@ -303,8 +303,8 @@ #define CAP_EMPTY_SET to_cap_t(0) #define CAP_FULL_SET to_cap_t(~0) -#define CAP_INIT_EFF_SET to_cap_t(~0&~CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_SETPCAP)) -#define CAP_INIT_INH_SET to_cap_t(0) +#define CAP_INIT_EFF_SET to_cap_t(~0) +#define CAP_INIT_INH_SET to_cap_t(~0) #define CAP_TO_MASK(x) (1 << (x)) #define cap_raise(c, flag) (cap_t(c) |= CAP_TO_MASK(flag)) Would it be inappropriate to create a kernel-patch package for this patch? What should I call it? (I'm thinking kernel-patch-rtcap or kernel-patch-capability) 1. http://jackit.sourceforge.net/docs/faq.php#a5 2. http://www.tml.hut.fi/~tilmonen/givertcap/ 3. http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/security/linux-privs/kernel-2.4/capfaq-0.2.txt -- Hans Fugal | De gustibus non disputandum est. http://hans.fugal.net/ | Debian, vim, mutt, ruby, text, gpg http://gdmxml.fugal.net/ | WindowMaker, gaim, UTF-8, RISC, JS Bach --------------------------------------------------------------------- GnuPG Fingerprint: 6940 87C5 6610 567F 1E95 CB5E FC98 E8CD E0AA D460
Attachment:
pgpA_wsoaYqTX.pgp
Description: PGP signature