[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Exec-Shield vs. PaX

> You are trying to make a big fuss about this for no good reason.

Ingo, please. it was *you* who objected to PaX's default enforcement
policy because it broke Linus's rule. yet you did the same with your
own default *and* contested the fact that you hadn't broken anything.
i don't have a problem with your choice for default policies, i have
a problem when you have a double standard ('kettos merce' in your
mother tongue).

Reply to: