[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should deborphan really look in libdevel by default?

> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > I've just upgraded deborphan package, and now when called without any
> > args it lists all installed library development packages!
> The new --libdevel switch makes this optional.
> Please lern about our BTS.  'serious' is not the right severity for this
> kind of issue  (#218125).

Sorry. I've meant "important", not "serious". Since these two words mean 
almost the same in human language, it was my mistake to use one instead of 
other it this case.

> important 
>   a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without
>   rendering it completely unusable to everyone.

Just the case.

Reply to: