Re: Should deborphan really look in libdevel by default?
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > I've just upgraded deborphan package, and now when called without any
> > args it lists all installed library development packages!
> The new --libdevel switch makes this optional.
> Please lern about our BTS. 'serious' is not the right severity for this
> kind of issue (#218125).
Sorry. I've meant "important", not "serious". Since these two words mean
almost the same in human language, it was my mistake to use one instead of
other it this case.
> a bug which has a major effect on the usability of a package, without
> rendering it completely unusable to everyone.
Just the case.