On 2003-10-24, Georg Nikodym <georgn@somanetworks.com> wrote: > Then, of course, there's the inevitable argument about the definition of > GIS itself. (and no, I'm not trying to start it because I have no GIS > qualifications) If GIS can mean many different things, surely it's a good idea to say what the scope of this package, in particular, is? Peace, Dylan