Re: Pre-Depends for postgresql
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:24:21PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:00:47AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Pre-Dependencies are supposed to be discussed at d-devel which I
> > want to do now. If anybody objects I will just do it.
>
> Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of discussing these sorts of
> things?
>
> As it stands, I don't see a problem with the pre-depends, but your
> attitude is... disquieting.
To me, it read like a typo for "If nobody objects".
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: