Re: Pre-Depends for postgresql
On 2003-10-16 19:24 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:00:47AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Pre-Dependencies are supposed to be discussed at d-devel which I want
> > to do now. If anybody objects I will just do it.
> Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose of discussing these sorts of things?
> As it stands, I don't see a problem with the pre-depends, but your attitude
> is... disquieting.
Please take my excuse, I guess my English fooled me this morning. I
just read that again and see what you are meaning...
Actually I meant "if nobody objects I will do it" (*slapping my
head*). In the sense that I don't require twenty replies saying just
"yes", but would rather be interested in opinions why it should _not_
Sorry again and have a nice day!