On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 10:13:36AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > Or, alternatively, this was the only crappy NMU that was noticed while > quite a few others were made against ancient packages with inactive > maintainers who didn't notice or didn't care. I'm not terribly > interested in going through all the NMUs done and attempting to prove > this but I find it more likely than the possibility that only one poor > NMU was done during that period. kdemultimedia was broken via NMU as well, but I don't hold that against lamont since he did many other proper and useful NMUs. ;) KDE in general is not a good thing to NMU since it is very complicated and breaks easily. Although I still don't understand how lamont managed to get his NMU to compile on his own machine since it didn't compile on any other arch. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature