also sprach Herbert Xu <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2003.10.03.0121 +0200]: > I have given you the reason for this many times already. Please > reread the thread on debian-devel carefully. This one post did in fact slip my eyes. In it, you mention some checks when it comes to patch inclusion. I have a particular problem with: * If it's a feature, can it be disabled/enabled at runtime? Sinec we're making generic kernels, this is a must. The presence of the patch should not prevent me from doing something that I would otherwise be able to do. I cannot disable IPsec at runtime as I cannot replace the IP stack at runtime, and it modifies the IP stack. Moreover, you state the reason why you should not put IPsec in the kernel right there: "The presence of the patch should not prevent me from doing something that I would otherwise be able to do." Well, it does. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: PGP signature