On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:48:34AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 05:38:50PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > > > As far as the BTS is concerned, it is irrelevant how a bug is fixed. > > > > Wrong. The BTS is a front-end to users. When bugs are closed, the > > submitter(a normal user) is notified. This notification *must* include a > > user-oriented response. "This is fixed" is not such a response. > > "This is fixed" is the only response that makes sense to every bug > submitter. "This is fixed" is the only response that is useless to everyone. I guess that explains its appeal to you... -- G. Branden Robinson | You could wire up a dead rat to a Debian GNU/Linux | DIMM socket and the PC BIOS memory branden@debian.org | test would pass it just fine. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Ethan Benson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature