Re: propose new virtual package: libxaw-dev
On 19-Sep-03, 15:25 (CDT), "Craig P. Steffen" <email@example.com> wrote:
> This doesn't say "must declare a dependency on a real package". If that's
> somewhere else in the policy, then please let us know.
The fact that something isn't in policy doesn't mean it's not a bug. (Yeah,
way too many negatives in that sentence, let's try it again:) Not all bugs
are listed in policy. (There, that's better.)
Is there some reason that you seriously object to specifying a real
package before the virtual? Or are you just being difficult?
Fix the damn bug and move on.
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable operating
system and Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the
world. -- seen on the net