Re: Horrific new levels of changelog abuse
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 09:07:23PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
[snip]
> But the relevance is in the change itself, not the fact that it fixed a
> bug in the Debian BTS. From that we can draw the conclusion that
> upstream changes do not belong in the Debian changelog if the only
> reason for them being there is that they caused a Debian bug to be
> closed.
You would find it reasonable to omit things like
* New upstream version
from the Debian changelog too, then?
Regards: David Weinehall
--
/) David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /) Northern lights wander (\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Full colour fire (/
Reply to: