Hi
Am Do, 2003-09-18 um 14.09 schrieb Martin Quinson:
> Cool ! Could this be abused to subscribe to bugs? I mean, is it possible to
> have more than one owner to a given bug?
>
> I'd like to subscribe to, say, all l10n bug of dpkg, since I already started
> to help them find a solution by contacting the relevant l10n ML and so on,
> and now, I'd like to know what happen to them. But I cannot claim I'll fix
> the japanese gramatical issues, for example.
>
> Is "owner" done for the use I plan, or should I refrain myself and wait for
> a "subscriber" or "fellow" or whatever which would have the same syntax than
> "tag" (with + implied and - possible) ?
I created a subscription feature for the BTS during debcamp, but it
still need deep review by the BTS maintainers, which is going to happen
after the sarge release. Additionally, I will have to go over it again
and make it work with the new status file format. Maybe I could document
it somewhere, so that others can comment it.
It is more sophisticated t that having a tag-like fellow thing in the
way that it requires confirmation.
nomeata
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
e-Mail: mail@joachim-breitner.de | Homepage: http://www.joachim-breitner.de
JID: joachimbreitner@amessage.de | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C | ICQ#: 74513189
Geekcode: GCS/IT/S d-- s++:- a--- C++ UL+++ P+++ !E W+++ N-- !W O? M?>+ V?
PS++ PE PGP++ t? 5? X- R+ tv- b++ DI+ D+ G e+>* h! z?
Bitte senden Sie mir keine Word- oder PowerPoint-Anhänge.
Siehe http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.de.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil