Re: Horrific new levels of changelog abuse
Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 05:45:53PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>> This is starting to happen far too often for my comfort, so I feel the need
>> to rant a bit.
>
> He's just following the fine example set by Herbert Xu.
No he is not. As usual you're producing drivel about things that you
don't understand.
For the benefit of those who have not read the previous discussions,
my position is that the Debian changelog should document all Debian
changes, whether or not they happen to fix bugs in the BTS.
The changes refered in the message that started this thread certainly
looked like Debian changes so they should have been documented.
What I oppose to is the ad-hoc listing of upstream changes when they
happen to close bugs in the BTS.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to: