Hello! [Sat, 13 Sep 2003] Michał Politowski wrote: > I may be wrong, so I think I'll refer to the debian-devel wisdom before > a possible reopening. Ropening is not your job! > How do you define _package_'s copyright and license when the _package_ > contains parts distributed under different licenses? The package's copyright is the upstream copyright. If I add files with different licenses, I specify those licenses in the repective files (if possible). > > Damn! You are simply riping that part of the sentence from the file > > without any hesitation? It's not even a full sentence! > > No it isn't... You didn't quote a full sentence. If it wasn't a quote _and_ if you had put a full stop after it, it might have been. > ...but I don't think the rest of it adds anything to the argument. > You probably mean "published by the Free Software Foundation", but why > should I have to refer to external, overseas sources to see the text > of the license? All the packages that contain a manpage based on the template from debhelper include that snippet. Go ahead and file RC-bugs... Robert.
Attachment:
pgpJIilMaR8l4.pgp
Description: PGP signature