[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#207300: tmda: Challenge-response is fundamentally broken

On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 11:49:40PM +0000, Brian May wrote:
> 2. All checks have to be automatic, and there is no chance of manual
> review to ensure that the messages where geniune before bouncing it.

Actually, I'm pretty sure SA is statistically better than an average
person scanning subject lines of an unfiltered inbox. And if a real 
user gets his message bounced as spam, he/she has a chance to retry 
the message via some alternative transport, like POTS or snailmail,
instead of getting the message buried in the reciepents spam folder.

Riku Voipio  	       |    riku.voipio@iki.fi         |
kirkkonummentie 33     |    +358 40 8476974          --+--
02140 Espoo            |                               |
dark> A bad analogy is like leaky screwdriver          |

Attachment: pgpn74g1reD_d.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: