Re: Accepted kaffe 1:1.1.1-1 (i386 source)
reopen 51230
reopen 61264
reopen 75800
reopen 77869
reopen 116802
reopen 141597
reopen 158743
reopen 170021
reopen 170059
reopen 193263
reopen 196254
reopen 197617
reopen 202779
reopen 81389
reopen 200434
reopen 196867
thanks
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Ean R. Schuessler wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:18:37 -0500
> Source: kaffe
> Binary: kaffe
> Architecture: source i386
> Version: 1:1.1.1-1
> Distribution: unstable
> Urgency: low
> Maintainer: Ean R. Schuessler <ean@novare.net>
> Changed-By: Ean R. Schuessler <ean@novare.net>
> Description:
> kaffe - A JVM to run Java bytecode
> Closes: 51230 61264 75800 77869 81389 116802 141597 158743 167936 170021 170059 193263 196254 196867 197617 200434 202779
> Changes:
> kaffe (1:1.1.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * New upstream release closes many bugs. (Closes: #51230, #61264,
> #75800, #77869, #116802, #141597, #158743, #170021, #170059,
> #193263, #196254, #197617, #202779, #81389, #200434, #196867)
> * /usr/lib/jni is now checked for JNI libraries. (Closes: #167936)
This is not a proper changelog entry.
A proper entry is as follows:
* New upstream release.
* no longer does foo when bar happens. Closes: #12345
* wrapper script rewritten to not use $$ in tempfile names. Closes: #12345
Please, everyone remember, a changelog documents *changes*. It's not a tool
to close bugs automatically.
The BTS sends these close messages to the submitter when the bug is closed.
However, the email above has no reason as to why the bug was closed. It's not
sufficient to just say a new upstream version was uploaded, which just happens
to fix the bug. As a submitter, would you feel satisified that you had just
gotten such a mail?
Reply to: