Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> writes: > no. that's wrong for 2.4+ kernels. Interesting, as it seems to be the status quo; I have a bunch of modules in /lib/modules/2.4.21/misc (from four different modules packages produced via make-kpkg), which incidentally all seem to load fine. No need to Cc me, BTW. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger amu@monk.mit.edu (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.