Re: Accepted fltk 1.0.11-11.1 (i386 source all)
Andrew Suffield <email@example.com> writes:
> So what you were saying is, the package could not be built from source
> correctly anyway, and he only fixed one of the two bugs?
Right. (Emphasis on "correctly" -- the build did nominally succeed.)
> That's an independant bug; why was it not filed when g++ 3 became the
Good question. Lameness?
At any rate, I have uploaded an -11.2 which should (I think...)
restore sanity and keep -11.1 from making it out of incoming.
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger firstname.lastname@example.org (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.