Re: stack protection
Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au> writes:
> Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to start
> depending on it.
Indeed, it's looking likely that GregKH's `udev' will replace devfs
sometime in the future.
[It was amusing to see Christoph Hellwig's recent patch on the lkml
changing devfs from `EXPERIMENTAL' directly to `OBSOLETE' (and he has a
fairly good record of getting devfs patches accepted by Linus). :-/ ]
-Miles
--
Is it true that nothing can be known? If so how do we know this? -Woody Allen
Reply to: