Re: stack protection

To: Xavier Roche <roche@httrack.com>, Debian Devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: stack protection
From: Russell Coker <russell@coker.com.au>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:49:14 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 200308211749.14339.russell@coker.com.au>
Reply-to: russell@coker.com.au
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.10.10308210923550.15413-100000@linux.localnet.loc>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.10.10308210923550.15413-100000@linux.localnet.loc>

On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 17:39, Xavier Roche wrote:
> Major issues for a ro-/ are maybe:
> - using devfs for /dev (kernel 2.4 and package devfsd installed)

Devfs is getting less support now, it might not be the best time to start 
depending on it.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: stack protection
  - From: Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp>
- Re: stack protection
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>

References:
- Re: stack protection
  - From: Xavier Roche <roche@httrack.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian Weekly News - August 19th, 2003
Next by Date: Norton AntiVirus failed to scan an attachment in a message you sent.
Previous by thread: Re: stack protection
Next by thread: Re: stack protection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread