[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: NM non-process

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:56:08PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Heh :) If I hadn't responded to it manually, it would have gotten ignored
> > as spam (nobody cared enough to write a nice formail -r message because it
> > happens rarely enough and the spambounces would waste us more resources).
> > [policy of d-d-a]
> Yes, I can see the problem. However, it would have helped me much if
> this policy would have been clearly stated at
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/ (should I open a bug,
> or can it be fixed without?).

Please file a minor bug on listarchives, I'll get to it by tonight.

     2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Reply to: