Re: Should MUA only Recommend mail-transfer-agent?
* Colin Watson [Wed, Aug 06 2003, 08:36:25AM]:
> > Why not appease both? Let mutt depend on
> > mail-transport-agent | no-user-mta
> > and tell such MTA hating users to create a fake "no-user-mta" package
> > with equivs.
> There's no point; it's just as easy to create a fake package that
> provides mail-transport-agent with equivs. Or they could install
> something tiny like nullmailer or ssmtp and leave it at that.
This OTOH may be dangerous, another packages that really rely on a
working /usr/sbin/sendmail must be able to depend on
mail-transport-agent and get one.