Re: NM non-process
neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode) writes:
> Steve Langasek said:
> >I don't think it irrelevant that those clamouring loudest for the DPL
> >to do something to fix the situation are people who don't actually have
> >a say in the outcome of DPL elections. While I'm not happy to see such
> >long DAM wait times, I'm also not volunteering to take on the thankless
> >job myself.
>
> No, it's not irrelevant. It means precisely that Debian is in danger of
> becoming an unresponsive, closed group which does not admit new people.
> If this continues for, say, 2 more years, I would expect a new Project
> to be formed, replicating what Debian is doing, but admitting new
> people. I'd probably be right there starting it.
>
> That would be a stupid waste of effort, so I hope it turns out to be
> unnecessary.
I know of several DDs and non-DDs thinking about creating a Debian2 (or
whatever named) project due to this and other lack of responce
problems and the group is growing. The danger is already there and
should not be ignored.
MfG
Goswin
Reply to: