Re: NM non-process

[Goswin Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>]

Kalle Kivimaa <kalle.kivimaa@iki.fi> writes:

> Roland Mas <lolando@debian.org> writes:
> > with.  The MIA problem is significant enough that NM might be the only
> > way to tackle with it seriously.  That means taking time to examine
> > applications.
> 
> BTW, has anybody done any research into what types of package
> maintainers tend to go MIA? I would be especially interested in a
> percentage of "old" style DD's, DD's who have gone through the NM
> process, people going MIA while in the NM queue, and people going MIA
> without ever even entering the NM queue. I'll try to do the statistics
> myself if nobody has done it before.

And how many NMs go MIA because they still stuck in the NM queue after
years? Should we ask them? :)

MfG
        Goswin