[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Multiple so-versions of a lib in unstable are bad



On Mon, 04 Aug 2003, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen <tfheen@raw.no> writes:
> > | If libd1 is uploaded and only one of proga and libv0 is recompiled with
> > | libd1 this results in proga linked with both so-versions of the library. 
> > | I remember problems with two so-versions of libpng, later with
> > | libssl0.9.6 and libssl0.9.7, and with libvorbis (at the time of the big
> > | libvorbis breakage [1]
> >
> > This is solved with versioned symbols.
> 
> While still preserving compatibility with other GNU/Linux
> distributions?

There is no such thing.  If you need multi-disto compatibility, you must use
whatever (old) set of libs are defined in LSB, or link statically.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh



Reply to: