[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Multiple so-versions of a lib in unstable are bad



On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:02:58PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk 
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
> | If libd1 is uploaded and only one of proga and libv0 is recompiled with
> | libd1 this results in proga linked with both so-versions of the library. 
> | I remember problems with two so-versions of libpng, later with
> | libssl0.9.6 and libssl0.9.7, and with libvorbis (at the time of the big
> | libvorbis breakage [1]
> 
> This is solved with versioned symbols.

It can be solved with versioned symbols.

How many libraries in unstable use versioned symbols?
At least on my system, it's only a very small minority.

> | There are problems with so-name changes (I remember one library having
> | 5 (five) different so-names within one month), but they should be 
> | solvable via communication between maintainers.
> 
> libgal(23 at the moment), I'd think?

Yup (but it's better now).

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



Reply to: