[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: update-alternatives priorities for editors

Colin Watson wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > I personally would not have had either elvis or vim supply an
> > alternative for /usr/bin/editor.
> I don't mind lowering the priority of vi clones, or whatever; but please
> don't try to get them removed from the editor alternative. It's quite
> sufficient to have higher-priority editors installed by default.

Just to clarify, I am not advocating a change here.  What I meant was
that I would not have done it that way myself had I been doing it when
it was originally done.  But having been done so long ago it should
probably stay like it is.  Like many things, once broken it must
always be broken or something else breaks.


Attachment: pgpvERryx4Qjx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: