[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mawk is a required package but I have replaced it with gawk

In other news for Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 10:45:02AM +0800, Dan Jacobson has been seen typing:
> I see mawk is a required package, but I have replaced it with gawk.
> Why isn't there some meta package called awk, where either mawk or
> gawk will satisfy it?
Because of the secret Debian conspiracy to unfairly discriminate against
GNU packages just to annoy you and RMS. Haven't we discussed this at
length already?

Rens Houben                           |    opinions are mine
Resident linux guru and sysadmin      | if my employers have one
Systemec Internet Services.           |they'll tell you themselves
PGP public key at http://swordbreaker.systemec.nl/shadur.key.asc

Attachment: pgpSwSSvbvdxr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: