"Matt Ryan" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: > Steve Langasek asked: >>Are you saying that you intend to go on record as sponsoring this NM, >>not on grounds of familiarity with his work, but because you're opposed >>to the existence of a central authority that decides who is given >>developer access? > > Based on what was originally stated about the list archives providing proof > of why they shouldn't be allowed to be a developer - yes. In a subsequent > private email I have been told that problems are apparent with the 'quality' > of the packaging which I'm planning to investigate before moving forward. > What happens next depends on this investigation but if it turns out to be a > difference of opinion rather than a deep technical problem than I'll go on > record and sponsor. Maybe your time would be better spent checking the quality of your own package first. Now running lintian... W: ssmtp source: ancient-standards-version 220.127.116.11 E: ssmtp: control-file-has-bad-permissions conffiles 0400 != 0644 E: ssmtp: control-file-has-bad-permissions preinst 0555 != 0755 E: ssmtp: control-file-has-bad-permissions postinst 0555 != 0755 E: ssmtp: control-file-has-bad-permissions postrm 0555 != 0755 E: ssmtp: control-file-has-bad-permissions config 0555 != 0755 E: ssmtp: control-file-has-bad-permissions templates 0555 != 0644 W: ssmtp: no-section-field W: ssmtp: no-priority-field Finished running lintian. -- Poems... always a sign of pretentious inner turmoil.
Description: PGP signature