Andreas Barth wrote: > Marc is doing it the other way: He want an interface to reject a > package before substantial work has been spent on it. So there > shouldn't be this conflict any more, which would be a good thing. Isn't this why ITPs are usually CCed to debian-devel? Look what has been done to the email ITP, to the mplayer ITP, ... I don't know what that "directory name" deal is, but basically I have the feeling that ftpmaster is predicatble (in fact reasonable) enough for the public review on -devel to anticipate decisions. No need to bother the ftpmasters with every package where -devel or -mentors or whoever would very accurately identify the problems it would have once it was uploaded. Cheers T.
Description: PGP signature