On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 02:10:43PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 01:46:11AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote: > > > RFCs aren't software, and so applying the Debian Free /Software/ > > Guidelines to them seems a little odd. > > But...but...what if you want to make your own "RFC 2661" by embracing and > extending the existing one, and redistribute it to all your friends calling > it "RFC 2661"? It's taking away your freedom! Requiring a rename of a copyrighted work doesn't violate the DFSG. The "new" RFC license, however, does more than that. http://bugs.debian.org/92810 contains more information. -- G. Branden Robinson | A committee is a life form with six Debian GNU/Linux | or more legs and no brain. branden@debian.org | -- Robert Heinlein http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpa9wQmSVQ_F.pgp
Description: PGP signature