Re: G++ 3.2 transition: How're we doing?
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:52:32PM -0700, Cardenas wrote:
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but...
> Can you explain a bit more about your process for generating this
> list? Why are the packages in the exceptions file in there?
There seem to be two types of things in the exceptions list: g++ libraries
and Qt version 2. Qt made the c102 transition at the same time as a soname
change, and qt2 is meant to stay with the old ABI which Qt3 has the c102
ABI. (that's my understanding anyway)
> It seems that you're not including the c102 packages. Attached is a
> list of the c102 packages, and its longer than 1.
Because a c102 package has presumably completed the transition to c102?
I think you're confusing g++ 3.0 with g++ 3.2.