Re: Fun with python-apt

[Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>]

On Monday, Jun 16, 2003, at 16:43 US/Eastern, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 03:46:13PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> > Now, if we changed sarge to use g++-c102 (as I briefly suggested),
> > would that prevent this problem in sarge+1 or sarge+2 or whenever the
> > ABI changes again?
>
> no, because we WANT the packages beeing build with the new abi.

g++-c102 => g++3.3 (i.e., c102 is the new ABI)

>  We jus twant
> to make sure that lib providing pakcages are built with the same gcc 
> as lib
> consuming ones.

Yep. That's the point of my proposal. They would be. When you changed a 
package to use the new c103 (or whatever the next ABI is), you'd change 
the library dependencies to the c103 versions.