Re: Every spam is sacred: tagging mails because of their content or their supposed origin?
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 19:33, Joey Hess wrote:
> Today I noticed those summaries were getting spamassassing scores in the
> 30 range. I ended up whitelisting myself, though that doesn't feel like
> a good idea -- now SA might mislearn spam subjects as ham, and any
> spammer who forges mail from me will probably get through.
>
> Aside from bypassing SA entirely for local mail, is there any better
> approach?
You could add a special keyword into the summaries, and have its
spamassassin score be -1000 or whatever.
Reply to: