Re: Bug#196800: flex mustn't assume stdint.h is available onallplatforms
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 21:59:37 +0800, Cameron Patrick <cameron@patrick.wattle.id.au> said:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 08:05:22AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> That is a given for any program that generates C code, and always
>> has been: No representations can be made about C code when compiled
>> on a non-conrming platform, the behavious is always undefined.
> Yes, but when the program changes from generating code which
> conforms to both the C90 (?) /and/ C99 standards to generating code
> which conforms to C99 but /doesn't/ conform to the earlier standard,
> /and/ compilers which conform to the latter standard are by no means
> ubiquitous, surely this change is worthy of being being mentioned
> somewhere prominent?
Hmm. You may have a point.
manoj
--
An ounce of hypocrisy is worth a pound of ambition. Michael Korda
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: