Re: Every spam is sacred
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 10:55:27PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>
> > I agree that if it's only about adding a header, this isn't a big
> > deal, although I agree with debian-admin in that we don't need to use
> > the extra bandwidth.
>
> It's already been stated that DSBL allows their zone to be transferred
> via rsync, so we can run a local mirror of their blacklist. Thus,
> minimal bandwidth usage.
>
> Frankly, I just don't believe that any of the arguments against this
> proposal hold up.
What about "the list is not free"?
Do we want to have a list transfered to Debian which we cannot transfer to
anyone?
mooch
--
Jesus Climent | Unix SysAdm | Helsinki, Finland | pumuki.hispalinux.es
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Registered Linux user #66350 proudly using Debian Sid & Linux 2.4.20
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken.
--Tyles Durden (Fight club)
Reply to: