[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC: fewer vim variants



On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:43:58PM -0700, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> I propose to have only the following:
>   vim  (aka vim-tiny; no interpreters, no docs)
>   kvim (including all non-threaded interpreters; kde support; no docs)
>   gvim (including all non-threaded interpreters; gtk2 support; no docs)
>   vim-doc

What about a version _with_ all non-threaded interpreters, but _without_
gtk2/kde support?

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli  --  Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it}  -  http://www.bononia.it/zack/
"  I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!  " -- G.Romney

Attachment: pgpfTsVgk5xua.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: