Re: Every spam is sacred
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 11:45:53AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Spam is determined by the contents of the email, not by the
> factr that someone in that IP block may have sopammed some one else
> at some point in the mists of time.
Mail from an old, abandoned and abused proxy (RBLed from months or years
I mean), for example, is spam for me, even if I don't check content.
Remember that there's a steganography method that "hides" message
content in spam mails. Should we blame it if DDs like steganography?
--
Christian Surchi, csurchi@debian.org, christian@firenze.linux.it | ICQ
www.debian.org - www.softwarelibero.it - www.firenze.linux.it | 38374818
You don't become a failure until you're satisfied with being one.
Reply to: