Re: Every spam is sacred
Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> a tapoté :
> On Thursday, Jun 12, 2003, at 08:04 US/Eastern, Mathieu Roy wrote:
>
> > "they do so out of a practical desire to get their mail delivered",
> > it's
> > a game of word. By fear of having some of their mail not delivered,
> > they avoid some ISP.
>
> And, so?
>
> >
> > You deliberately harm innocent people using these ISP just because
> > they use this ISP.
>
> Yeah, in the same sense I deliberately harm a telemarketer by refusing
> to buy his wares, getting an answering machine, or just hanging up on
> him.
If you cut the phone-line the telemarketer is using because you think
he is doing a nasty job, yes.
> You seem to be missing a fundamental distinction between murder and
> refusal to communicate:
> 1) You have a right to live
> 2) You have no right to communicate with me against my wishes.
> Further, I have a right to refuse to communicate with you.
Your 2 is off-topic.
We're a speaking of a general policy, a system-wide policy, not an
individual policy.
The 2 would be in fact
2) You have no right to broke communication between two
persons just because you do not like the ISP of the sender
one.
--
Mathieu Roy
Homepage:
http://yeupou.coleumes.org
Not a native english speaker:
http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english
Reply to: