Re: Every spam is sacred
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 12:46:48AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> How about, "because we have been unfairly listed as being spammers and
> had our mail blocked, even though we were innocent, we refuse to
> participate and endorse a system which in the past as been used to
> unfairly block innocents, including who were unfortunate enough to
> share netblocks with those whose political views were at odds from
> those who had run DNSBL's?"
No, that can't be it, because Santiago only asked for a warning mode,
and the general objection towards blocking IPs doesn't exist either,
because we already use a DNS-based blacklist of our own (rbl.debian.net).
> But I at least am glad that the Debian admins have chose[n] to use an
> approach such as spamassassin, rather than DNS blacklists.
No, they have not, SpamAssassin is not used for all mail @debian.org.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Reply to: