[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#197049: ITP: conglomerate -- an XML editor for GNOME



Hi,

IMHO, unstable is a good  place for it.  Upload Conglomerate in unstable
and fill an RC bug "not usable at  the moment" to be sure it will not go
to testing, even if it's buggy.

Everyone knows that unstable is not stable ;-)

Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:14:54PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:59:21PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > 
> >  > Anyway,  conglomerate  is  still   not  ready  for  inclusion  in
> >  > unstable, it is  buggy and dies frequently, i  was thinking about
> >  > doing an experimental  upload only, but i suppose  i cannot close
> >  > the ITP/RFP bugs in this case, right ?
> > 
> >  Why not?  A package would be available, which is what the submitter
> >  requested.
> 
> But in  experimental only, and  given that experimental has  almost no
> visibility, and is  difficult and discouraged to use,  i would let the
> RFP/ITP bug open,  be it only to inform people  a package is available
> in experimental, so a new RFP/ITP doesn't get filled.
> 
> I have  no experience in  uploading new packages to  experimental, and
> don't know  what the usual  practice is in  such cases. I  guess there
> were few enough such cases that no clear practice exists anyway.
> 
> Friendly,
> 
> Sven Luther

-- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg
   Formateur Cellule Programmation.

Attachment: pgpWxiyymbsod.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: