Re: texmf.cnf again
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 17:56:38 +0200, Marcelo E Magallon <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:11:10AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> > - Use ucf to avoid pushing users to the ghetto
>> > - Use only /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf (instead of
>> > /etc/texmf/texmf.d/...)
>> > - Conform to policy
>> The last is not, in my opinion, an option. TeTeX must conform to
>> policy. Whether the maintainers use option 1 or 2 is up to them, I
>> am not here to micromanage the package.
> Ok, you *are* being purposely obtuse. Who said anything about
> *options*? It's the three things _together_.
If you use only /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf (instead of
/etc/texmf/texmf.d/...) you do not need ucf. If you use ucf, you
could use either a single file, or the .d dir and construct the
current file at instasll time.
Indeed, there are so many combinatrions given the three items you
mentioned, that it is more reasonable to treat the first two as
independent options, and select any combination to arrive at the
Support Mental Health. Or I'll kill you.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C