Re: texmf.cnf again
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 10:21:22 +0200, Marcelo E Magallon <email@example.com> said:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:21:05AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> My texmf.conf, however, is shared, and this problem is something
>> that does nag at me. I fail to see why we need to break
>> compatibility with every other tetex installation in the world.
> Manoj, it seems you are being purposely obtuse. Which part of
Sure, or I may be dumb. Let us see.
> "default" don't you understand? You can change it. If you read my
> original email you'll see I wasn't asking why the question exists
> at all, but why it defaults to yes and why it has such a high
Fine. You just make it so that if I have debconf-frontend non
interactive, my hand crafted changes are not over written. I don't
care how the question is worded, or the default is set.
He, in a few minutes ravished this fair creature, or at least would
have ravished her, if she had not, by a timely compliance, prevented
him. Henry Fielding, "Jonathan Wild"
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C