[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: texmf.cnf again

On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 10:21:22 +0200, Marcelo E Magallon <mmagallo@debian.org> said: 

> On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 01:21:05AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> My texmf.conf, however, is shared, and this problem is something
>> that does nag at me. I fail to see why we need to break
>> compatibility with every other tetex installation in the world.

>  Manoj, it seems you are being purposely obtuse.  Which part of

	Sure, or I may be dumb. Let us see.

>  "default" don't you understand?  You can change it.  If you read my
>  original email you'll see I wasn't asking why the question exists
>  at all, but why it defaults to yes and why it has such a high
>  priority.

	Fine. You just make it so that if I have debconf-frontend non
 interactive, my hand crafted changes are not over written. I don't
 care how the question is worded, or the default is set. 


He, in a few minutes ravished this fair creature, or at least would
have ravished her, if she had not, by a timely compliance, prevented
him. Henry Fielding, "Jonathan Wild"
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: