Re: texmf.cnf again
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 11:33:26 +0100, Colin Watson <email@example.com> said:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:47:47AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>> >> Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > If the default were to overwrite my local changes without
>> > asking me would be a serious bug.
>> > Consider if I too were using the non-interactive front end.
>> Agreed, in principle. But howcome I don't see you complaining
>> about /etc/modules.conf, which has been automatically generated
>> from /etc/modutils/* for years and has confused the heck out of
>> users all over the world?
> Err ... you do: bug #150513.
When I get some energy, I'll raise the severity of that bug
again, since it is indeed a violation of policy. But I also realize
that I would perhaps be the only one soldiering on about that policy
I'm definitely not in Omaha!
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C