[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: texmf.cnf again

On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 11:33:26 +0100, Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> said: 

> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:47:47AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>> >> Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
>> > 	If the default were to overwrite my local changes without
>> >  asking me would be a serious bug.
>> >
>> > 	Consider if I too were using the non-interactive front end.
>> Agreed, in principle.  But howcome I don't see you complaining
>> about /etc/modules.conf, which has been automatically generated
>> from /etc/modutils/* for years and has confused the heck out of
>> users all over the world?

> Err ... you do: bug #150513.

	When I get some energy, I'll raise the severity of that bug
 again, since it is indeed a violation of policy. But I also realize
 that I would perhaps be the only one soldiering on about that policy

I'm definitely not in Omaha!
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: