[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#193497: marked as done (svtools: svsetup uses bashism "echo -e")

Josip Rodin <joy@srce.hr> wrote:
> I was only ever in the situation where naming closed bugs in the changelog
> was non-trivial on two occasions, when the upstream maintainer sent me the
> list of bugs he reviewed and said should be closed. Both times I reviewed
> the lists myself, to double-check and avoid typos and such. I added short
> descriptions the first time, but I was too lazy to do it the second time.
> Now that I look back at that changelog, the one where there are no
> descriptions looks pretty lame compared to the other.

OK.  Let me ask you this question: what if the maintainer uploads a
new upstream release which happens to fix bug #xxx, and then sends
a message by hand to xxx-done@bugs.debian.org with the message
"This bug is fixed in upstream version x.y.z".

Do you have a problem with this and if so why?
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Reply to: