Re: Bug#190302: Misusage of changelog!
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 03:10:36PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Anybody has the right to express a point of view on anybody else work,
I'll try to keep in mind this gentlemen example of "expressing a point of view on
anybody else work" next time, so i'll not misunderstend it with an offense.
> You said you have "to list each change in the upstream changelog" to
> know which bug can be declared as closed. And that's, as maintainer,
> your job, isn't it? But is it users job to do it too?
I do not understand that: could you rephrase?
> Is this mature?
It is as much mature as all the argument you people brought to this
discussione, from my point of view. If you asked that question yourself,
you're probably going to understand my point.
> You still did not answer to the question: is it too much extra work
> you can afford to add in the changelog what permits you to declare a
> bug closed?
Speaking about entry like "New upstream closes #...", my position is:
This kind of request is futile, redundant and of no real need in _any_ case.
Hunting maintainers down for a log entry of that kind is a waste of time
either for the maintainer and for the hunters. All the arguments brought to
this discussion to confute my observation are so childish and contraddictory,
that the only way i have to demonstrate it is to act as previously stated.
Have a nice day,
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''. | something in common: they
local LANG="it_IT@euro" | don't depend on the language.