Re: Maintaining kernel source in sarge
Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:
>
> All definite benefits. The one thing which seems to be missing is to ensure
> that the arch-specific kernels do not miss out on important fixes (such as
> security) to the main kernel source tree.
Yes that isn't easy to check apart from the fact that if there isn't
an arch update after a security update to kernel-source, then that arch
is probably vulnerable. If you've got an idea on how this can improved,
please let us know.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to: