Re: Maintaining kernel source in sarge
On Sun, 25 May 2003 19:33, Herbert Xu wrote:
> In the long term, we should have as few binary module packages as
> possible. They should either be integrated into our kernel-source
> if it is popular enough or made source-only so that the people who
> really need them can build them privately. I would see alsa in the
> former category (it is already integrated into 2.5) and pcmcia-cs in
> the latter (the built-in pcmcia works for most people).
This sounds very sensible.
What is the status of the pcmcia support anyway? What is broken in the
in-kernel support? Is there anything we can do to make the in-kernel code
work better and get more people to use it?
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page