Re: Maintaining kernel source in sarge
On Sat, May 24, 2003 at 08:10:20PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > in task_struct then perhaps so assuming that we care about it enough to do
> > it in such a way. Otherwise I don't see your point.
> Are task_struct and mm_struct exposed to modules?
> they should need to be, but I am no expert in the kernel. If this is meant
> to be this way, then shouldn't the struct have some amount of padding to
> allow for changes like this without breaking compatibility?
At least not for upstream. If you think it's valueable for debian
to provide this do it.